
GALAXYSURF - Galaxy Surfactants Limited Share Price
Chemicals & Petrochemicals
Valuation | |
---|---|
Market Cap | 7.75 kCr |
Price/Earnings (Trailing) | 25.43 |
Price/Sales (Trailing) | 1.7 |
EV/EBITDA | 14.92 |
Price/Free Cashflow | 38.38 |
MarketCap/EBT | 20.35 |
Enterprise Value | 7.7 kCr |
Fundamentals | |
---|---|
Revenue (TTM) | 4.56 kCr |
Rev. Growth (Yr) | 31.6% |
Earnings (TTM) | 304.68 Cr |
Earnings Growth (Yr) | -0.30% |
Profitability | |
---|---|
Operating Margin | 8% |
EBT Margin | 8% |
Return on Equity | 12.9% |
Return on Assets | 8.8% |
Free Cashflow Yield | 2.61% |
Price to Sales Ratio
Revenue (Last 12 mths)
Net Income (Last 12 mths)
Growth & Returns | |
---|---|
Price Change 1W | -6.7% |
Price Change 1M | -14.2% |
Price Change 6M | -4% |
Price Change 1Y | -23.2% |
3Y Cumulative Return | -11.1% |
5Y Cumulative Return | 3.2% |
7Y Cumulative Return | 8% |
Cash Flow & Liquidity | |
---|---|
Cash Flow from Investing (TTM) | -294.59 Cr |
Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) | 420.51 Cr |
Cash Flow from Financing (TTM) | -157.31 Cr |
Cash & Equivalents | 193.41 Cr |
Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 201.85 Cr |
Free Cash Flow/Share (TTM) | 56.93 |
Balance Sheet | |
---|---|
Total Assets | 3.46 kCr |
Total Liabilities | 1.1 kCr |
Shareholder Equity | 2.36 kCr |
Current Assets | 2.1 kCr |
Current Liabilities | 978.31 Cr |
Net PPE | 1.02 kCr |
Inventory | 723.88 Cr |
Goodwill | 3.1 Cr |
Capital Structure & Leverage | |
---|---|
Debt Ratio | 0.04 |
Debt/Equity | 0.06 |
Interest Coverage | 16.45 |
Interest/Cashflow Ops | 20.27 |
Dividend & Shareholder Returns | |
---|---|
Dividend/Share (TTM) | 22 |
Dividend Yield | 1.01% |
Shares Dilution (1Y) | 0.00% |
Shares Dilution (3Y) | 0.00% |
Summary of Latest Earnings Report from Galaxy Surfactants
Summary of Galaxy Surfactants's latest earnings call, featuring management's outlook on business performance, financial results, and analyst Q&A sessions that highlight key strategic initiatives and market challenges.
Last updated:
In the Q1 FY 2025-26 earnings call, management provided an optimistic yet cautious outlook for Galaxy Surfactants. They reported a 5% year-on-year increase in consolidated volumes and a 9% quarter-on-quarter rise, with EBITDA growing by 4.5% to INR 135 crores compared to INR 129 crores in Q1 FY 2024-25. EBITDA per metric ton remained stable at around INR 20,000 despite prevailing challenges.
Notable points highlighted include:
- Domestic Growth: Domestic volumes achieved a modest 3% growth year-on-year but surged by 15% quarter-on-quarter due to favorable monsoon conditions and declining repo rates.
- Regional Performance: The AMET region experienced flat growth year-on-year, yet a sequential increase of 5% was noted, with Egypt and Turkey remaining challenging markets.
- Rest of the World Segment: This segment reported approximately 16% year-on-year growth, driven by LATAM and APAC, although the U.S. market saw customers adopting a cautious stance due to tariff uncertainties.
- Supply Chain Resilience: The supply chain has adapted well to geopolitical challenges, although raw material availability remains a concern, especially following disruptions from suppliers in Southeast Asia.
- Innovation Success: Galaxy Hearth's new product was awarded a Platinum Award for innovation in the home care segment, highlighting the company's commitment to R&D.
- Future Pricing: Management anticipates elevated feedstock prices might stabilize but are prepared for potential adjustments based on market conditions.
- Guidance on Market Sentiment: While there's cautious optimism for better performance in the second half of the financial year, the outcome largely hinges on the upcoming festive season's demand recovery.
Management expressed confidence in navigating current challenges and is committed to pursuing long-term strategies aligned with their Vision 2030 objectives.
Last updated:
Here are some key Q&A exchanges from the earnings transcript for Galaxy Surfactants Limited's Q1 FY 2025-26 earnings call:
Question (Harshil Parekh): "Sir, my first question is with respect to your comments in the presentation about some strategic product alignment in response to multinational shifts in the domestic market. What adjustments are being made?" Answer (K. Natarajan): "Given persistently high feedstock prices, customers are trying to realign formulations. We see this as a temporary phase, and we are preparing to meet that demand with flexible product offerings."
Question (Harshil Parekh): "Regarding the Tri-K business in the U.S., how is the traction since you added capacities?" Answer (K. Natarajan): "Tri-K faced challenges last quarter due to customers holding back orders amid tariff uncertainties. We're hopeful this will improve in H2 once tariffs are clarified, as customers are exploring various options."
Question (Arun Prasath): "What is happening to gross margin on a per kg basis?" Answer (K. Natarajan): "We have faced timing issues in passing on increased raw material prices. Despite elevated prices, our ability to pass on costs has been impacted. Structural factors are not the issue; it's mainly product mix and tariff uncertainties affecting our Premium Specialty segment."
Question (Sanjesh Jain): "Unilever reported higher growth than you. Are we losing market share or facing competition?" Answer (K. Natarajan): "We recorded a 3% volume growth. While it's lower than Unilever's 4%, we believe it's a flattish scenario stemming from overall cautious market demand and reformulations by some customers to manage costs."
Question (Sanjesh Jain): "What is the current status of the Egyptian market?" Answer (K. Natarajan): "The Egyptian market is facing challenges due to currency depreciation and market dynamics favoring integrated players. We are actively seeking alternatives to regain market share."
Question (Rohit Nagraj): "How has the dialogue with U.S. customers evolved since tariff announcements?" Answer (K. Natarajan): "Customer engagement has focused on mitigating service continuity despite tariffs. Discussions involve exploring options between India and Egypt to assure our commitment in this unstable tariff environment."
Question (Aditya Khetan): "Is this jump in realization due to higher LA prices?" Answer (K. Natarajan): "Yes, and we anticipate these prices to decline, which would help revive demand, especially in India where customers are currently reluctant to purchase at elevated prices."
Question (Praveen Kumar): "How do you see the AMET region evolving?" Answer (K. Natarajan): "Despite challenges in Egypt and Turkey, we are looking to replace revenue from these markets through growth in Africa and the Middle East, and we remain optimistic about our diverse customer portfolio."
These exchanges capture significant insights into the company's strategic positioning, market dynamics, and operational adjustments amid evolving market conditions.
Share Holdings
Understand Galaxy Surfactants ownership landscape with insights into key distribution patterns, offering investors a clear view of stakeholder dynamics.
Holding Pattern
Share Holding Details
Shareholder Name | Holding % |
---|---|
Unnathan Shekhar | 11.92% |
Shashikant Rayappa Shanbhag | 11.56% |
Ramakrishnan Gopalkrishnan | 6.66% |
Yash Sudhir Patil | 5.79% |
Siddharth Sudhir Patil | 5.79% |
Galaxy Chemicals, Partner Gopalkrishnan Ramakrishnan | 5.47% |
Galaxy Chemicals, Partner Late Sandhya Sudhir Patil | 5.47% |
Galaxy Chemicals, Partner Shashikant Rayappa Shanbhag | 5.47% |
Galaxy Chemicals, Partner Shekhar Unnathan | 5.47% |
Jayashree Ramakrishnan | 5.2% |
Axis Mutual Fund | 4.38% |
Nippon Life India | 3.64% |
ICICI Prudential | 3% |
Jayshree Ramesh | 1.64% |
Galaxy Emulsifiers Pvt Ltd | 1.53% |
Abu Dhabi Investment Authority | 1.45% |
ICICI LOMBARD | 1.01% |
Lakshmy Shekhar | 0.36% |
Sridhar Unnathan | 0.1% |
Vandana Shashikant Shanbhag | 0.03% |
Overall Distribution
Distribution across major stakeholders
Ownership Distribution
Distribution across major institutional holders
Is Galaxy Surfactants Better than it's peers?
Detailed comparison of Galaxy Surfactants against industry peers, highlighting key financial metrics, valuation ratios, and performance indicators to provide competitive context within the sector.
Ticker | Name | Mkt Cap | Revenue | Price %, 1M | Returns, 1Y | P/E | P/S | Rev 1-Yr | Inc 1-Yr |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VINATIORGA | Vinati Organics | 17.66 kCr | 2.31 kCr | -12.50% | -14.40% | 41.53 | 7.65 | - | - |
FINEORG | Fine Organic Industries | 14.83 kCr | 2.42 kCr | -7.60% | -10.10% | 35.8 | 6.13 | - | - |
BALAMINES | Balaji Amines | 5.06 kCr | 1.4 kCr | -10.80% | -27.40% | 33.23 | 3.6 | - | - |
Sector Comparison: GALAXYSURF vs Chemicals & Petrochemicals
Comprehensive comparison against sector averages
Comparative Metrics
GALAXYSURF metrics compared to Chemicals
Category | GALAXYSURF | Chemicals |
---|---|---|
PE | 25.90 | 50.25 |
PS | 1.73 | 4.49 |
Growth | 18 % | 8.7 % |
Performance Comparison
GALAXYSURF vs Chemicals (2021 - 2025)
- 1. GALAXYSURF is NOT among the Top 10 largest companies in Specialty Chemicals.
- 2. The company holds a market share of 3.2% in Specialty Chemicals.
- 3. In last one year, the company has had an above average growth that other Specialty Chemicals companies.
Income Statement for Galaxy Surfactants
Balance Sheet for Galaxy Surfactants
Cash Flow for Galaxy Surfactants
What does Galaxy Surfactants Limited do?
Galaxy Surfactants Limited manufactures and markets surfactants and other specialty ingredients in India and internationally. It offers fatty alcohol sulfates and ether sulfates, fatty alcohol ethoxylates and labsa, foam and viscosity boosters, mild surfactants, pearlizers, surfactant blends, syndets and TBB, sunscreens, functional actives, and preservatives and blends for personal care and home care products, including skin care, oral care, hair care, cosmetics, toiletries, and detergent products, as well as baby care, sun care, surface care, dishwash, and hand wash products. Galaxy Surfactants Limited was founded in 1980 and is based in Navi Mumbai, India.