
GSFC - Gujarat State Fertilizers & Chem.Ltd Share Price
Fertilizers & Agrochemicals
Valuation | |
---|---|
Market Cap | 8.01 kCr |
Price/Earnings (Trailing) | 13.45 |
Price/Sales (Trailing) | 0.81 |
EV/EBITDA | 8.1 |
Price/Free Cashflow | -27.06 |
MarketCap/EBT | 10.65 |
Enterprise Value | 7.73 kCr |
Fundamentals | |
---|---|
Revenue (TTM) | 9.85 kCr |
Rev. Growth (Yr) | -1.9% |
Earnings (TTM) | 591.16 Cr |
Earnings Growth (Yr) | 216% |
Profitability | |
---|---|
Operating Margin | 8% |
EBT Margin | 8% |
Return on Equity | 4.87% |
Return on Assets | 4.11% |
Free Cashflow Yield | -3.7% |
Price to Sales Ratio
Revenue (Last 12 mths)
Net Income (Last 12 mths)
Growth & Returns | |
---|---|
Price Change 1W | -0.30% |
Price Change 1M | -1% |
Price Change 6M | -0.80% |
Price Change 1Y | -13.9% |
3Y Cumulative Return | 8.7% |
5Y Cumulative Return | 27.3% |
7Y Cumulative Return | 8.8% |
10Y Cumulative Return | 10.4% |
Cash Flow & Liquidity | |
---|---|
Cash Flow from Investing (TTM) | -171.65 Cr |
Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) | 83.48 Cr |
Cash Flow from Financing (TTM) | -158.67 Cr |
Cash & Equivalents | 285.45 Cr |
Free Cash Flow (TTM) | -296.06 Cr |
Free Cash Flow/Share (TTM) | -7.43 |
Balance Sheet | |
---|---|
Total Assets | 14.37 kCr |
Total Liabilities | 2.22 kCr |
Shareholder Equity | 12.15 kCr |
Current Assets | 5.65 kCr |
Current Liabilities | 1.3 kCr |
Net PPE | 2.5 kCr |
Inventory | 1.48 kCr |
Goodwill | 0.00 |
Capital Structure & Leverage | |
---|---|
Debt Ratio | 0.00 |
Debt/Equity | 0.00 |
Interest Coverage | 73.54 |
Interest/Cashflow Ops | 9.27 |
Dividend & Shareholder Returns | |
---|---|
Dividend/Share (TTM) | 4 |
Dividend Yield | 1.98% |
Shares Dilution (1Y) | 0.00% |
Shares Dilution (3Y) | 0.00% |
Risk & Volatility | |
---|---|
Max Drawdown | -31.7% |
Drawdown Prob. (30d, 5Y) | 48.85% |
Risk Level (5Y) | 48.1% |
Summary of Latest Earnings Report from Gujarat State Fertilizers & Chem.
Summary of Gujarat State Fertilizers & Chem.'s latest earnings call, featuring management's outlook on business performance, financial results, and analyst Q&A sessions that highlight key strategic initiatives and market challenges.
Last updated:
Outlook by Management:
GSFC anticipates sustained fertilizer demand driven by favorable monsoon conditions and improved Kharif prospects. Fertilizer margins remain under pressure due to reduced subsidies (-13% YoY) and elevated raw material costs (benzene, natural gas). However, prompt subsidy disbursements support liquidity. The company is optimizing product mix (prioritizing APS/NPK over DAP due to negative DAP margins) to enhance profitability. Industrial products face challenges from Chinese dumping, but new initiatives like HX Crystal production (value-added caprolactam derivative) and cost optimization (importing cheaper Anone) aim to improve margins.
Key Points:
- Financial Performance: Q1 FY25 PAT rose to Rs.93 Cr (vs. Rs.21 Cr in Q4 FY24) due to fertilizer volume growth (30% YoY) and better product mix.
- Fertilizer Segment: Sales hit Rs.2,144 Cr (second-highest Q1 in 15 years). DAP margins negative (-Rs.42 Cr impact in Q1); APS/NKP margins at Rs.2,000-2,500/ton.
- Raw Materials: Phosphoric acid prices steady at $850/ton; ammonia costs reduced, but benzene/NG prices rose.
- Projects: Sulphuric acid plant, HX Crystal (commissioning by FY25 end), and urea revamping (capacity: 800→1,123 TPD) to drive efficiency and FY26 margins.
- Industrial Products: Capro-benzene spreads fell to $582/ton (vs. $730 YoY). Loss of Rs.4 Cr in Q1; recovery expected via HX Crystal and cost measures.
- Subsidy & Policy: Awaiting potential DAP subsidy hike to offset negative margins. Urea penalties (energy inefficiency) may ease post-revamping.
(Characters: 1,838)
Last updated:
Question 1:
"In the last interaction...whether those discounts of INR2,000 per ton, which we have offered last quarter was withdrawn...and over and above that, that INR15 increase in the subsidy would have helped us...was the improved performance because of some benefits...natural gas converting to ammonia?"
Answer:
Subsidy increases for APS were minimal. Discounts on ammonium sulphate softened slightly due to revised MRP and lean seasonality. Natural gas costs rose 6% YoY but were offset by urea subsidy pass-through. Ammonia production at Sikka relies on imports, with gas prices at INR45/SM3 in Q1.
Question 2:
"What broad range of per ton margins we should work with...for ammonium sulphate, DAP, NPK, and urea?"
Answer:
Average fertilizer margins: INR2,000"“2,500/ton, but DAP margins are negative. Urea margins are lower due to energy penalties and fixed costs.
Question 3:
"When will our phosphoric acid production ramp up...dependency on imports reduce? Would DAP volumes/margins improve?"
Answer:
Phosphoric acid self-sufficiency at Sikka will take 2"“3 years. Baroda unit already uses in-house phosphoric acid. DAP margins may turn positive if subsidies increase, but current contributions remain negative.
Question 4:
"How are DAP inventory accumulation and NBS subsidy revisions impacting margins? What is DAP's negative impact on Q1?"
Answer:
DAP production continues despite negative margins (INR42 crore dent in Q1) due to anticipated subsidy hikes. Current DAP sales prioritize farmer needs and government pressure; breakeven is expected if subsidies rise by INR3,500/ton.
Question 5:
"What is the capex and timeline for HX Crystal, sulphuric acid, and urea projects? Impact on margins?"
Answer:
INR1,000 crore allocated for HX Crystal, sulphuric acid, urea revamp, and solar projects in FY25. HX Crystal (commissioned by FY25 end) will boost IP margins via value-added products. Urea revamp will cut energy use and raise capacity by 323 TPD, improving profitability.
Question 6:
"What is the outlook for industrial chemicals amid Chinese dumping? Capro-benzene breakeven levels?"
Answer:
IP segment faces pressure from cheap Chinese imports. Capro-benzene spread needs ~$700/ton to breakeven (currently $582). Mitigation includes importing cheaper raw materials (Anone) and diversifying into HX Crystal (higher margins).
Question 7:
"Post-urea revamp, what energy efficiency gains and margin improvements are expected?"
Answer:
Revamp will reduce energy use from 6.5"“6.6 Gcal/ton to 5.9 Gcal/ton, aligning with government norms. Capacity rises to 1,123 TPD, adding INR30+ crore annual profit. Current urea margins remain low due to legacy inefficiencies.
Revenue Breakdown
Analysis of Gujarat State Fertilizers & Chem.'s financial performance, highlighting revenue trends, growth patterns, and key metrics through quarterly analysis.
Last Updated: Mar 31, 2025
Description | Share | Value |
---|---|---|
FERTILIZER PRODUCTS | 72.8% | 1.4 kCr |
INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS | 27.2% | 523.1 Cr |
Total | 1.9 kCr |
Share Holdings
Understand Gujarat State Fertilizers & Chem. ownership landscape with insights into key distribution patterns, offering investors a clear view of stakeholder dynamics.
Holding Pattern
Share Holding Details
Shareholder Name | Holding % |
---|---|
GUJARAT STATE INVETMENTS LIMITED | 37.84% |
QUANT MUTUAL FUND - QUANT SMALL CAP FUND | 3.43% |
Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers Company Limited | 1.88% |
Gujarat Alkalies And Chemicals Limited | 1.88% |
ICICI PRUDENTIAL SMALL CAP FUND | 1.37% |
Gujarat Mineral Development Corporation Ltd | 1.25% |
Overall Distribution
Distribution across major stakeholders
Ownership Distribution
Distribution across major institutional holders
Is Gujarat State Fertilizers & Chem. Better than it's peers?
Detailed comparison of Gujarat State Fertilizers & Chem. against industry peers, highlighting key financial metrics, valuation ratios, and performance indicators to provide competitive context within the sector.
Ticker | Name | Mkt Cap | Revenue | Price %, 1M | Returns, 1Y | P/E | P/S | Rev 1-Yr | Inc 1-Yr |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COROMANDEL | Coromandel International | 72.02 kCr | 26.79 kCr | +3.70% | +50.20% | 31.8 | 2.69 | - | - |
CHAMBLFERT | Chambal Fertilisers & Chemicals | 21.56 kCr | 16.86 kCr | -4.00% | +10.40% | 13.07 | 1.28 | - | - |
DEEPAKFERT | Deepak Fertilizers &Petrochemicals | 19.36 kCr | 10.36 kCr | -4.50% | +80.90% | 20.74 | 1.87 | - | - |
RCF | Rashtriya Chemicals & Fertilizers | 8.44 kCr | 17.1 kCr | -3.20% | -27.00% | 34.76 | 0.49 | - | - |
NFL | National Fertilizers | 4.85 kCr | 19.88 kCr | -2.10% | -31.50% | 26.37 | 0.24 | - | - |
Sector Comparison: GSFC vs Fertilizers & Agrochemicals
Comprehensive comparison against sector averages
Comparative Metrics
GSFC metrics compared to Fertilizers
Category | GSFC | Fertilizers |
---|---|---|
PE | 13.45 | 21.91 |
PS | 0.81 | 1.42 |
Growth | 3.3 % | 2 % |
Performance Comparison
GSFC vs Fertilizers (2021 - 2025)
- 1. GSFC is among the Top 10 Fertilizers companies but not in Top 5.
- 2. The company holds a market share of 6.1% in Fertilizers.
- 3. In last one year, the company has had an above average growth that other Fertilizers companies.
Income Statement for Gujarat State Fertilizers & Chem.
Balance Sheet for Gujarat State Fertilizers & Chem.
Cash Flow for Gujarat State Fertilizers & Chem.
What does Gujarat State Fertilizers & Chem.Ltd do?
Gujarat State Fertilizers & Chemicals Limited manufactures and sells fertilizers and chemicals in India. The company operates in two segments, Fertilizer Products and Industrial Products. It offers fertilizers, including neem urea, di-ammonium phosphate, boronated NPK, ammonium phosphate sulphate, ammonium sulphate, APS, muriate of potash, gypsum, and micro mix. The company provides industrial products, such as v, nylon-6, anhydrous ammonia, cyclohexanone, sulphuric acid, technical grade urea, melamine, methyl ethyl ketoxime, hydroxylamine sulphate crystal, cyclohexane, argon gas, oleum, as well as methanol, nitric acid, ammonium sulphate, anone-anol mixture, melamine cyanurate, and potassium dihydrogen phosphate. In addition, the company offers water soluble fertilizers; sulphur based products; plant tissue culture products; micro nutrients; soil conditioners; organic products; and seeds. Further, it is involved in the provision of agro services; trading of agro input products; provision of port and logistics related services; and treatment and supply of waste water. The company was incorporated in 1962 and is based in Vadodara, India.