
High Scoring Large Cap stocks have outperformed low scoring stocks by 90% over last 4 years
Buy Backs: Company has bought back it's stock in the past which is a good thing.
Balance Sheet: Strong Balance Sheet.
Momentum: Stock has a weak negative price momentum.
Past Returns: Underperforming stock! In past three years, the stock has provided -18.4% return compared to 7.6% by NIFTY 50.
Dividend: Stock hasn't been paying any dividend.
Valuation | |
|---|---|
| Market Cap | 2.34 kCr |
| Price/Earnings (Trailing) | -80.1 |
| Price/Sales (Trailing) | 1.53 |
| EV/EBITDA | 25.63 |
| Price/Free Cashflow | 21.03 |
| MarketCap/EBT | -53.42 |
| Enterprise Value | 2.29 kCr |
Fundamentals | |
|---|---|
| Revenue (TTM) | 1.53 kCr |
| Rev. Growth (Yr) | 14.7% |
| Earnings (TTM) | -1.12 Cr |
| Earnings Growth (Yr) | 20.4% |
Profitability | |
|---|---|
| Operating Margin | -5% |
| EBT Margin | -3% |
| Return on Equity | -0.08% |
| Return on Assets | -0.05% |
| Free Cashflow Yield | 4.76% |
Growth & Returns | |
|---|---|
| Price Change 1W | -0.80% |
| Price Change 1M | 0.40% |
| Price Change 6M | -14.1% |
| Price Change 1Y | -32.5% |
| 3Y Cumulative Return | -18.4% |
| 5Y Cumulative Return | -4.6% |
Cash Flow & Liquidity | |
|---|---|
| Cash Flow from Investing (TTM) | 16.65 Cr |
| Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) | 111.16 Cr |
| Cash Flow from Financing (TTM) | -115.47 Cr |
| Cash & Equivalents | 46.3 Cr |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 111.16 Cr |
| Free Cash Flow/Share (TTM) | 9.07 |
Balance Sheet | |
|---|---|
| Total Assets | 2.05 kCr |
| Total Liabilities | 756.54 Cr |
| Shareholder Equity | 1.34 kCr |
| Current Assets | 577.14 Cr |
| Current Liabilities | 297.47 Cr |
| Net PPE | 1.52 kCr |
| Inventory | 189.28 Cr |
| Goodwill | 0.00 |
Capital Structure & Leverage | |
|---|---|
| Debt Ratio | 0.00 |
| Debt/Equity | 0.3 |
| Interest Coverage | -2.19 |
| Interest/Cashflow Ops | 4.03 |
Dividend & Shareholder Returns | |
|---|---|
| Shares Dilution (1Y) | 0.00% |
| Shares Dilution (3Y) | 0.00% |
Buy Backs: Company has bought back it's stock in the past which is a good thing.
Balance Sheet: Strong Balance Sheet.
Momentum: Stock has a weak negative price momentum.
Past Returns: Underperforming stock! In past three years, the stock has provided -18.4% return compared to 7.6% by NIFTY 50.
Dividend: Stock hasn't been paying any dividend.
Investor Care | |
|---|---|
| Shares Dilution (1Y) | 0.00% |
| Earnings/Share (TTM) | -2.38 |
Financial Health | |
|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.94 |
| Debt/Equity | 0.3 |
Technical Indicators | |
|---|---|
| RSI (14d) | 58.84 |
| RSI (5d) | 66.61 |
| RSI (21d) | 55.26 |
| MACD Signal | Buy |
| Stochastic Oscillator Signal | Hold |
| SharesGuru Signal | Buy |
| RSI Signal | Hold |
| RSI5 Signal | Hold |
| RSI21 Signal | Hold |
| SMA 5 Signal | Buy |
| SMA 10 Signal | Buy |
| SMA 20 Signal | Buy |
| SMA 50 Signal | Buy |
| SMA 100 Signal | Buy |
Summary of Greenpanel Industries's latest earnings call, featuring management's outlook on business performance, financial results, and analyst Q&A sessions that highlight key strategic initiatives and market challenges.
Management at Greenpanel Industries Limited provided an optimistic yet cautious outlook for FY '27, emphasizing the ongoing geopolitical situation in the Middle East as a key variable affecting their business.
Key highlights from management include:
Overall, Greenpanel is strategically positioned to focus on volume growth while managing costs amid fluctuating market conditions.
1. Question: What is the FY '27 guidance for MDF volume growth and margin? Answer: We expect the MDF industry to grow at a pace of early double digits to mid-teens. Given the current variables, it's difficult to provide specific growth numbers. Our strategy will be to pursue volume growth while aiming to retain or improve our margins, though providing a formal figure right now is challenging given the uncertainties.
2. Question: The 15% price hike taken in MDF, has it absorbed the entire cost inflation or is more needed? Answer: The 15% price increase has just about absorbed our current cost inflation. However, due to muted demand and competitive pressures, we're observing discounting in the market. Thus, the complete effect of the price increase isn't fully realized yet, though if implemented effectively, it should cover the rises in costs to date.
3. Question: What was the response to the demand after the price increase? Answer: In March, there was a lot of stocking before the price increase. April was somewhat muted as demand adjusted to the new costs. Only critical and priority projects are moving forward, while others are holding back. Overall, the demand hasn't returned fully to normal yet.
4. Question: Why was domestic sales growth flat in Q4 despite stocking in March? Answer: Yes, domestic volumes were flat sequentially. We had high levels of pre-March stocking. Additionally, there was a significant drop in export volumes. Our aim was to strategically manage profitability rather than pursuing immediate high volumes, which affected the domestic numbers.
5. Question: How did the overall MDF industry perform in FY '26? Answer: The industry generally grew in the mid-teens to high-teens percentage range. Companies with smaller bases achieved higher growth rates, while some reduced realizations to capture market share through discounting.
6. Question: Can you quantify the new capacities expected to come online in FY '27? Answer: Two new capacities are anticipated in the second half of FY '27, one in Madhya Pradesh and another in Andhra Pradesh. The total expected capacity addition is around 400,000 cubic meters, but it will ramp up gradually, not all at once.
7. Question: How will timber prices move in FY '27, considering stability? Answer: We expect timber prices to remain stable as many players have shifted to different species besides Eucalyptus, alleviating pressure on that specific raw material. Hence, we do not foresee significant price changes this year.
8. Question: Can you provide insights on the margin outlook amidst margin pressure? Answer: We're cautious about margin guidance due to fluctuating chemical costs and ongoing uncertainties. Though we'd like to maintain or improve margins, industry discounting practices create a complex situation. We prefer to assess conditions more thoroughly in the first quarter before committing to a specific guidance.
9. Question: Will the remaining EPCG benefit be received in FY '27? Answer: The remaining EPCG benefit is tied to our export volumes. If geopolitical conditions stabilize, we anticipate accessing this benefit in FY '27. If export activity remains stymied, parts of it may roll into the next fiscal year.
10. Question: What are the future capex plans for Greenpanel? Answer: For FY '27, we focus on optimizing our current capacities over new capital expenditures. However, there will be basic sustenance capex around INR 20-30 crore, rather than any significant new investments. Our primary aim is to fully utilize existing capacity while reducing debt.
Analysis of Greenpanel Industries's financial performance, highlighting revenue trends, growth patterns, and key metrics through quarterly analysis.
No revenue data available.
Understand Greenpanel Industries ownership landscape with insights into key distribution patterns, offering investors a clear view of stakeholder dynamics.
| Shareholder Name | Holding % |
|---|---|
| Prime Holdings Pvt. Ltd. | 39.24% |
| Shobhan Mittal | 13.59% |
| Bandhan Value Fund | 7.05% |
| ICICI Prudential Flexicap Fund | 3.56% |
| HDFC Mutual Fund - HDFC Mid-Cap Fund | 3.48% |
| Kotak Mahindra Trustee Co Ltd A/C Kotak Consumption Fund | 3.1% |
| Franklin India Small Cap Fund | 2.86% |
| Tata Mutual Fund - Tata Aggressive Hybrid Fund | 2.45% |
| Sundaram Mutual Fund A/C Sundaram Small Cap Fund | 1.98% |
| Bluesky Projects Pvt. Ltd. | 0.31% |
| Shiv Prakash Mittal | 0% |
| Santosh Mittal | 0% |
| Rajesh Mittal | 0% |
| Karuna Mittal | 0% |
| Sanidhya Mittal | 0% |
| Chitwan Mittal | 0% |
| Master Aditya Mittal | 0% |
| Rajesh Mittal & Sons HUF | 0% |
| ADCO Capital Pte. Ltd. | 0% |
| Niranjan Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. | 0% |
Distribution across major stakeholders
Distribution across major institutional holders
Detailed comparison of Greenpanel Industries against industry peers, highlighting key financial metrics, valuation ratios, and performance indicators to provide competitive context within the sector.
Ticker | Name | Mkt Cap | Revenue | Price %, 1M | Returns, 1Y | P/E | P/S | Rev 1-Yr | Inc 1-Yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CENTURYPLY | Century Plyboards (India) | 17.44 kCr | 5.41 kCr | +8.30% | +6.90% | 66.47 | 3.23 | - | - |
| GREENLAM | Greenlam Industries | 6.66 kCr | 3.05 kCr | +7.60% | +4.60% | 118.61 | 2.18 | - | - |
| RUSHIL | Rushil Decor | 463.6 Cr | 862.22 Cr | +9.40% | -42.70% | 63.2 | 0.54 | - | - |
| DUROPLY | DUROPLY INDUSTRIES | 164.32 Cr | 398.49 Cr | -5.90% | -52.00% | 12.31 | 0.42 | - | - |
Comprehensive comparison against sector averages
GREENPANEL metrics compared to Consumer
| Category | GREENPANEL | Consumer |
|---|---|---|
| PE | -80.10 | 64.04 |
| PS | 1.53 | 2.22 |
| Growth | 3.1 % | 11.2 % |
Greenpanel Industries Limited engages in the manufacturing, marketing, and sale of plywood, medium density fibre board (MDF), and allied products in India and internationally. The company provides pre-laminated MDFs, interior and exterior grade MDF, carb P2 MDF, HDWR, plywood and blockboard furniture, wooden flooring, and decorative and commercial doors. It also exports its products. Greenpanel Industries Limited was incorporated in 2017 and is based in Kolkata, India.
This is an informational page just to provide a quick 'first look' at the stock. You must do your own deeper research. Know your risk appetite. Consult a SEBI-registered financial advisor before making any investment decisions.
GREENPANEL vs Consumer (2021 - 2026)